A specialist-generalist classification of the arable flora and its response to changes in agricultural practices

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Theory in ecology points out the potential link between the degree of specialisation of organisms and their responses to disturbances and suggests that this could be a key element for understanding the assembly of communities. We evaluated this question for the arable weed flora as this group has scarcely been the focus of ecological studies so far and because weeds are restricted to habitats characterised by very high degrees of disturbance. As such, weeds offer a case study to ask how specialization relates to abundance and distribution of species in relation to the varying disturbance regimes occurring in arable crops.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We used data derived from an extensive national monitoring network of approximately 700 arable fields scattered across France to quantify the degree of specialisation of 152 weed species using six different ecological methods. We then explored the impact of the level of disturbance occurring in arable fields by comparing the degree of specialisation of weed communities in contrasting field situations.</p> <p>The classification of species as specialist or generalist was consistent between different ecological indices. When applied on a large-scale data set across France, this classification highlighted that monoculture harbour significantly more specialists than crop rotations, suggesting that crop rotation increases abundance of generalist species rather than sets of species that are each specialised to the individual crop types grown in the rotation. Applied to a diachronic dataset, the classification also shows that the proportion of specialist weed species has significantly decreased in cultivated fields over the last 30 years which suggests a biotic homogenization of agricultural landscapes.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study shows that the concept of generalist/specialist species is particularly relevant to understand the effect of anthropogenic disturbances on the evolution of plant community composition and that ecological theories developed in stable environments are valid in highly disturbed environments such as agro-ecosystems. The approach developed here to classify arable weeds according to the breadth of their ecological niche is robust and applicable to a wide range of organisms. It is also sensitive to disturbance regime and we show here that recent changes in agricultural practices, i.e. increased levels of disturbance have favoured the most generalist species, hence leading to biotic homogenisation in arable landscapes.</p

Assessing non-intended effects of farming practices on field margin vegetation with a functional approach

International audienceTo assess the unwanted side effects of farming practices on non-target plants, we used a nationwide survey of the vegetation of arable field margin strips. The vegetation was surveyed during two years (2013, 2014) in 430 field margins distributed over all agricultural regions of France. We used two complementary multivariate, trait-based approaches to examine how ten plant traits were related to ten environmental variables describing abiotic conditions, landscape factors, field margin management and in-field practices. Generalized additive mixed models were also developed to assess how the same environmental variables correlated with species richness, functional diversity and relative richness of agrotolerant versus hemerophobic species. Traits responded primarily to an environmental gradient of landscape diversity and field margin management. For instance, narrow field margin strips, frequent management and presence of a ditch favoured annual plants, small size at maturity and perennial plants, respectively. The second environmental gradient affecting plant traits was related to field size and intensity of in-field farming practices. On this gradient, fertilizer drift appeared to have a much stronger effect on plant trait composition of field margin strips than herbicide drift. The relationship between species richness, or functional diversity, and environment was consistent with the trait-based approach: the two former variables were negatively correlated with agriculture intensification (e.g. field size). However, this analysis also highlighted new covariates, such as a negative relationship between frequency of herbicide use and species richness. Some of the observed patterns seemed to be driven by differential responses of agrotolerant versus hemerophobic species, with the latter being more species-rich under organic than under conventional farming. Despite efforts to reduce nitrogen inputs since the 2000s, our results shows that N-fertilization still has significant non-intended effects on field margin vegetation. More generally, increasing the width of field margin strips, keeping or restoring semi-natural elements (ditches, hedges) in the field boundary, and lowering the number of management events may promote grassland plant species more typical of semi-natural habitats

Report of a Pest Risk Analysis for Hydrocotyle ranunculoides

Hydrocotyle ranunculoides originates from the American continent and was introduced into the EPPO region as an ornamental plant for tropical aquaria and garden ponds, where it is still sold under its correct name, sometimes under other names (H. vulgaris, H. leucocephala, and H. natans which is a synonym of H. ranunculoides). The plant was first recorded as naturalised in the south-east of the UK in the 1980s (Newman, 2003). Naturalisation in the Netherlands and in Belgium was recorded in the last decade of the twentieth century (Baas & Duistermaat, 1999; Baas & Holverda, 1996; Krabben & Rotteveel, 2003; Verloove 2006, Invasive Species in Belgium Website). Deleterious impacts have been reported in these three countries. The species is also recorded in France, Ireland, Italy, Germany (see EPPO, 2009) but several EPPO countries are still free from H. ranunculoides and there are concerns that it may be able to enter and establish in further countries. This PRA assesses the risks of its further introduction into other EPPO countries and its current and predicted impact. An initial EPPO PRA was performed and approved in 2005. After the proposal of listing this species in the Directive 2000/29, the European Food Safety Authority reviewed the initial PRA and made some comments. The initial PRA is therefore revised in the view of the EFSA comments and of information having become available after the initial PRA (EFSA, 2007)

Écologie et impact d’une espèce invasive émergente en France : l’Ambroisie à épis lisses (Ambrosia psilostachya DC.).

L’Ambroisie à épis lisses (Ambrosia psilostachya DC.) est une Astéracée vivace originaire d’Amérique du Nord et introduite en France à la fin du XIXe siècle. Des observations de terrain font état d’une expansion récente et la formation de populations clonales assez denses pourrait présenter une menace pour la biodiversité dans certains habitats méditerranéens sensibles ou dégradés. Dans ce contexte, cette étude vise à identifier les habitats colonisés et les conditions écologiques favorables à son succès et à mesurer quels sont les impacts sur les communautés végétales des habitats semi-naturels envahis. Ambrosia psilostachya colonise principalement des milieux rudéraux (61 %), cultivés (14 %) et des habitats semi-naturels (pelouses sableuses, dunes) dégradés (12 %). Cette ambroisie vivace, si elle peut occuper les mêmes habitats qu’Ambrosia artemisiifolia (plante annuelle), sera présente dans les stations les plus stables de ces habitats. Ambrosia psilostachya présente de fortes abondances dans les végétations vivaces de début de succession (friches, bords de routes) mais est moins présente dans les habitats pionniers régulièrement perturbés ou stressants, suggérant que son optimum se situe à des niveaux de perturbations intermédiaires. La compétition interspécifique pourrait également agir comme le suggère son plus faible succès lorsqu’elle occupe des communautés composées d’espèces fonctionnellement proches, supposées utiliser les ressources de manière similaire. Aucun impact significatif sur la structure des communautés végétales occupées par A. psilostachya n’a été mis en évidence suggérant des conséquences limitées sur les communautés végétales. Toutefois, son développement dans les prairies à chiendents (Elytrigia spp.) serait à surveiller et une gestion intégrée des pâturages avec de fortes densités de plantes est à mettre en place. Ces premières données écologiques récoltées pourront permettre d’établir une meilleure cartographie du risque envahissant d’A. psilostachya en France.Western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya DC.) is a perennial member of the Asteraceae native to North America that was introduced into France at the end of the 19th Century. Field observations have provided evidence of a recent expansion and of the emergence of dense clonal populations potentially threatening the biodiversity of certain Mediterranean sensitive or degraded habitats. This study therefore aimed to identify the habitats colonized and the ecological conditions favouring successful colonization by this species, and to determine its impact on the plant communities of the semi-natural habitats invaded. Ambrosia psilostachya mostly colonizes ruderal (61 %) and cultivated (14 %) environments and degraded semi-natural (sandy grassland, dunes) environments (12 %). Western ragweed occupies the same habitats as the annual species Ambrosia artemisiifolia, but is found at the most stable sites in these habitats. Ambrosia psilostachya is highly abundant in the perennial vegetation at the start of succession (wasteland, roadsides), but is less frequent in more stressful, regularly disturbed pioneer habitats, suggesting a preference for sites with an intermediate level of disturbance. Interspecific competition may also have an effect, as suggested by its lower levels of success in communities consisting of functionally similar species thought to use the available resources in a similar manner. We found no significant impact on the structure of the plant communities occupied by A. psilostachya. However, the development of this plant in Elytrigia grasslands should be monitored and integrated pasture management, including a high plant density, should be implemented. The preliminary ecological data collected in this study should make it possible to establish a more accurate map of the risk of A. psilostachya invasion in France

Pest risk analysis for Myriophyllum heterophyllum

Myriophyllum heterophyllum presents an overall high phytosanitary risk for the EPPO region with a low uncertainty rating. The overall likelihood of M. heterophyllum continuing to enter the EPPO region is high. The plant is imported into the EPPO region as a misidentified aquatic species for aquaria and ponds and is already established in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland. The risk of entry into other EPPO countries through import is considered high. The risk of the species establishing in additional countries is high as movement through irrigation and river systems acts to connect countries, facilitating spread regionally. Spread may be accelerated by recreational activities in water bodies invaded by the weed. Impacts of the species within the EPPO region are likely to be severe (high score rating), including aquatic plant species displacement, habitat dominance and effects on other aquatic organisms

Pest risk analysis for Alternanthera philoxeroides

Alternanthera philoxeroides presents a high phytosanitary risk for the EPPO region with a low uncertainty rating. A. philoxeroides is already present in the EPPO region in France and Italy. Further spread within and between EPPO countries is considered likely. The overall likelihood of A. philoxeroides continuing to enter the EPPO region is medium. It is not clear how this species entered the EPPO region and there are no clear pathways of further introduction, as the species is not widely traded as an aquarium plant or as any other type of living plant material. There may be confusion with A. sessilis, or other Alternanthera species traded for aquarium, ornamental or food purposes. The risk of the species establishing in other EPPO countries is considered high as movement through irrigation and river systems may act to connect countries, facilitating spread regionally, especially through high energy unstable river systems that may encourage fragmentation. Spread may be significantly accelerated by water based recreational activities. The potential high impact of the species within the EPPO region should be considered similar to that seen in other countries where the species has invaded and become established; i.e. Australia and the southern states of North America. Impacts are likely to be more pronounced in countries and regions where the climate most suited to population, establishment, growth and spread

The prioritisation of a short list of alien plants for risk analysis within the framework of the Regulation (EU) No. 1143/2014

Thirty-seven alien plant species, pre-identified by horizon scanning exercises were prioritised for pest risk analysis (PRA) using a modified version of the EPPO Prioritisation Process designed to be compliant with the EU Regulation 1143/2014. In Stage 1, species were categorised into one of four lists – a Residual List, EU List of Minor Concern, EU Observation List and the EU List of Invasive Alien Plants. Only those species included in the latter proceeded to the risk management stage where their priority for PRA was assessed. Due to medium or high spread potential coupled with high impacts twenty-two species were included in the EU List of Invasive Alien Plants and proceeded to Stage 2. Four species (Ambrosia trifida, Egeria densa, Fallopia baldschuanica and Oxalis pes-caprae) were assigned to the EU Observation List due to moderate or low impacts. Albizia lebbeck, Clematis terniflora, Euonymus japonicus, Lonicera morrowii, Prunus campanulata and Rubus rosifolius were assigned to the residual list due to a current lack of information on impacts. Similarly, Cornus sericea and Hydrilla verticillata were assigned to the Residual List due to unclear taxonomy and uncertainty in native status, respectively. Chromolaena odorata, Cryptostegia grandiflora and Sphagneticola trilobata were assigned to the Residual List as it is unlikely they will establish in the Union under current climatic conditions. In the risk management stage, Euonymus fortunei, Ligustrum sinense and Lonicera maackii were considered a low priority for PRA as they do not exhibit invasive tendencies despite being widely cultivated in the EU over several decades. Nineteen species were identified as having a high priority for a PRA (Acacia dealbata, Ambrosia confertiflora, Andropogon virginicus, Cardiospermum grandiflorum, Celastrus orbiculatus, Cinnamomum camphora, Cortaderia jubata, Ehrharta calycina, Gymnocoronis spilanthoides, Hakea sericea, Humulus scandens, Hygrophila polysperma, Lespedeza cuneata, Lygodium japonicum, Pennisetum setaceum, Prosopis juliflora, Sapium sebiferum, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta)

Arable Weeds and Management in Europe

“Arable Weeds and Management in Europe” is a collection of weed vegetation records from arable fields in Europe, initiated within the Working Group Weeds and Biodiversity of the European Weed Research Society (EWRS). Vegetation-plot data from this scientific community was not previously contributed to databases. We aim to prove the usefulness of collection for large scale studies through some first analyses. We hope to assure other weed scientists who have signalled willingness to share data, and plan to construct a full data base, making the data available for easy sharing. Presently, the collection has over 60,000 records, taken between 1996 and 2015. Many more studies for potential inclusion exist. Data originate mostly from studies exploring the effect of agricultural management on weed vegetation. The database is accompanied with extensive meta-data on crop and weed management on the surveyed fields. The criteria for inclusion were a minimum amount of information on the cultivated crop, and a georeference. Most fields were surveyed repeatedly, i.e. transects, multiple random plots, or repeated visits. All surveys aimed to record the complete vegetation on the plots. Sometimes, taxa were identified only to genus level, due to survey dates very early in the vegetation period. Plant taxonomy is standardized to the Euro+Med PlantBase